RESUMO
Resumo Introdução As resinas de polimetilmetacrilato e as bisacrílicas são materiais amplamente utilizados para a confecção de restaurações provisórias; no entanto, ambas apresentam uma característica de exotermia durante a polimerização que deve ser investigada por causa de possíveis interferências no sucesso clínico. Objetivo Avaliar a variação de temperatura de polimerização da resina bisacrílica e de uma resina acrílica quimicamente ativada, em preparos classe V, pelo método direto. Material e método Para isso, vinte dentes incisivos inferiores bovinos foram divididos em dois grupos: RA (N=10) com dentes restaurados com resina acrílica e RB (N=10) com dentes restaurados com resina bisacrílica. As mensurações das variações térmicas foram realizadas através de termopares tipo J, ligados a um termômetro óptico, e analisadas por um computador equipado com o software específico. Os dados obtidos foram analisados e submetidos à análise de médias comparadas pelo teste de Tukey (significância de 5%). Resultado Foi possível observar que não houve diferença estatística significante entre ambos os grupos experimentais (p=0,0739), mesmo que aumento de temperatura de RA tenha apresentado média maior (0,52 °C) do que RB (0,44 °C). Conclusão Não existe diferença significativa experimental entre o calor emitido pela resina acrílica e pela resina bisacrílica durante seus processos de polimerização, não definindo a característica de escolha de uma destas para as restaurações provisórias diretas.
Abstract Introduction Polymethyl methacrylate and bis-acryl resins are materials widely used for temporary restorations, however, both have a characteristic of polymerization exotermia that should be investigated because of possible interferences in clinical success. Objective to evaluate the variation of the polymerization temperature of bis-acryl resin and a chemically activated acrylic resin in the temporary restoration by the direct method. Material and method Twenty bovine mandibular incisor teeth were divided into two groups: AR (N = 10) teeth restored with acrylic resin and BR (N = 10) teeth restored with bis-acryl resin. Measurements of thermal variations were performed using type J thermocouples, connected to an optical thermometer and analyzed by a computer equipped with specific software. The obtained data were analyzed and submitted to the analysis of means compared by Tukey test (significance of 5%). Result It was observed that there was no statistically significant difference between both experimental groups (p = 0.0739), even though AR temperature increase presented higher average (0.52ºC) than BR (0.44ºC). Conclusion There is no significant experimental difference between the heat emitted by acrylic resin and bis-acryl resin during their polymerization processes, not defining the factor that characterizes a choice of a material for temporary restorations.
Assuntos
Resinas Acrílicas , Restauração Dentária Temporária , Polimerização , Polimetil Metacrilato , Temperatura AltaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several photobiomodulation (PBM) protocols with low-power lasers have been reported for pain control and tissue repair in the postoperative period of oral surgeries. However, there are still no reports of a protocol for bichectomy surgeries' postoperative period. OBJECTIVE: This article presents six reports of clinical cases in which bichectomy surgery was performed. METHODS: In the postoperative period, three patients were submitted to PBM with low-power lasers, while three patients did not receive it. Facial edema was evaluated using a millimeter tape. Pain was determined using the visual analog scale. RESULTS: Data of each clinical case were evaluated in a descriptive way and compared. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the PBM protocol on the postoperative period of bichectomy surgeries was evidenced by the decrease of edema and pain.
